4.7 Article

Soil inoculation method determines the strength of plant-soil interactions

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 1-6

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.05.020

Keywords

Plant-soil feedback; Soil inoculation; Ragwort; Soil community; Intraspecific variation; Jacobaea vulgaris; Senecio jacobaea

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is increasing evidence that interactions between plants and biotic components of the soil influence plant productivity and plant community composition. Many plant-soil feedback experiments start from inoculating relatively small amounts of natural soil to sterilized bulk soil. These soil inocula may include a variety of size classes of soil biota, each having a different role in the observed soil feedback effects. In order to examine what may be the effect of various size classes of soil biota we compared inoculation with natural field soil sieved through a 1 mm mesh, a soil suspension also sieved through a 1 mm mesh, and a microbial suspension sieved through a 20 gm mesh. We tested these effects for different populations of the same plant species and for different soil origins. Plant biomass was greatest in pots inoculated with the microbial suspension and smallest in pots inoculated with sieved soil, both in the first and second growth phase, and there was no significant population or soil origin effect. Plant-feeding nematodes were almost exclusively found in the sieved soil treatment. We show that processing the soil to obtain a microbial suspension reduces the strength of the soil effect in both the first and second growth phase. We also show that the results obtained with inoculating sieved soil and with a soil suspension are not comparable. In conclusion, when designing plant-soil feedback experiments, it is crucial to consider that soil inoculum preparation can strongly influence the observed soil effect. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available