4.7 Article

Discrete functional pools of soil organic matter in a UK grassland soil are differentially affected by temperature and priming

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 52-60

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.018

Keywords

Acclimation; Climate change; Biodegradation; Carbon cycling; Heterotrophic respiration

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We show that both temperature and priming act differently on distinct C pools in a temperate grassland soil. We used SOM which was C-14-labelled in four different ways: by labelling soil with C-14-glucose, by adding leaf litter from plants pre-labelled with (CO2)-C-14, and by labelling in situ with (CO2)-C-14 applied to the ryegrass canopy either 6 or 18 months earlier. Samples of each type of C-14 labelled soil were incubated at either 4, 10, 15, or 20 degrees C and the exponential loss of (CO2)-C-14 used to characterise treatment effects. C-14 allocation to microbial fractions was greater, and so overall mineralization by microbes was greater, as temperature rose, but turnover of the microbial labile pool was temperature-insensitive, and the turnover of microbial structural material was reduced as temperature rose. The ability of the microbial population to degrade just one fraction of plant litter was increased greatly by temperature. A pool of SOM with a half-life of about 70 d was degraded faster at higher temperatures. Less tractable but abundant pools of SOM were not accessed more readily at higher temperatures by the microbial population. Priming with glucose or amino-acids only speeded the mineralization of recent SOM (probably from the living microbial biomass), and was not altered by temperature. These results have implications for the impacts of climate change on soil C cycling. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available