4.7 Article

Drought alters respired δ13CO2 from autotrophic, but not heterotrophic soil respiration

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 50, Issue -, Pages 26-32

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.01.025

Keywords

Soil respiration; Carbon; Isotopes; Partitioning; Autotrophic; Heterotrophic

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Science (CFCAS)
  3. Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many researchers are interested in the variability of root-respired delta(CO2)-C-13 as an indication of linkages between belowground plant respiration and canopy processes. Most studies in this area have, however, relied upon the assumption that temporal variability of total soil respired delta(CO2)-C-13 reflects autotrophic soil processes, but in fact few supporting measurements of purely autotrophic soil respiration (partitioned from total soil respiration) are available. Here we use a combination of physical and isotopic partitioning methodologies to track the variability in autotrophic and heterotrophic soil delta(CO2)-C-13 at five sites in Eastern Canada during a very dry growing season. Three dimensional modeling of soil isotopic transport dynamics in the static sampling chambers allow us to constrain measurement bias and to eliminate non-steady-state effects as a potential driver of observed variability. We provide experimental results that support a pivotal assumption made in prior interpretations of soil delta(CO2)-C-13 dynamics: we observed minimal isotopic variability in soil microbial delta(CO2)-C-13 efflux, but appreciable temporal variability in root-respired delta(CO2)-C-13 at sites where near drought conditions were observed, suggesting that isotopic discrimination is likely linked to seasonal variations in transpirational demand. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available