4.7 Article

Temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in two boreal forest soil profiles

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 72-82

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.002

Keywords

Temperature sensitivity; Soil organic matter; Decomposition; Incubation; Substrate availability; Q(10)

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Controversial conclusions from different studies suggest that the decomposition of old soil organic matter (SOM) is either more, less, or equally temperature sensitive compared to the younger SOM. Based on chemical kinetic theory, the decomposition of more recalcitrant materials should be more temperature sensitive, unless environmental factors limit decomposition. Here, we show results for boreal upland forest soils supporting this hypothesis. We detected differences in the temperature sensitivity I between soil layers varying in their decomposition stage and SOM quality, and 2) inside the layers during a 495 day laboratory incubation. Temperature sensitivity increased with increasing soil depth and decreasing SOM quality. In the organic layers, temperature sensitivity of decomposition increased during the early part of a 495 day laboratory incubation, after respiration rate and SOM quality had notably This indicates that decomposition of recalcitrant compounds was more temperature sensitive decreased. than that of the labile ones. Our results imply that Q(10) values for total heterotrophic soil respiration determined from short-term laboratory incubations can either underestimate or overestimate the temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition, depending on soil layer, initial labile carbon content and temperature range used for the measurements. Using Q(10) values that ignore these factors in global climate models provides erroneous estimates on the effects of climate change on soil carbon storage. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available