4.7 Article

Temporal shifts in diversity and quantity of nirS and nirK in a rice paddy field soil

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 41, Issue 10, Pages 2044-2051

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.07.012

Keywords

Denitrification; Rice paddy field; Nitrite reductase; nirS; nirK; Clone library analysis; Real-time PCR; Temporal dynamics; Functional gene diversity

Categories

Funding

  1. Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution, Tokyo, Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Ministry of Agricultural, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Denitrification is an important part of the nitrogen cycle in the environment, and diverse bacteria, archaea, and fungi are known to have denitrifying ability. Rice paddy field soils have been known to have strong denitrifying activity, but the microbes responsible for denitrification in rice paddy field soils are not well known. Present study analyzed the diversity and quantity of the nitrite reductase genes (nirS and nirK) in a rice paddy field soil. sampled four times in one rice-growing season. Clone library analyses suggested that the denitrifier community composition varied over sampling time. Although many clones were distantly related to the known NirS or NirK, some clones were related to the NirS from Burkholderiales and Rhodocyclales bacteria, and some were related to the NirK from Rhizobiales bacteria. These denitrifiers may play an important role in denitrification in the rice paddy field soil. The quantitative PCR results showed that nirK was more abundant than nirS in all soil samples, but the nirK/nirS ratio decreased after water logging. These results suggest that both diversity and quantity changed over time in the rice paddy field soil, in response to the soil condition. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available