4.6 Article

A simple approach to characterizing block copolymer assemblies: graphene oxide supports for high contrast multi-technique imaging

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages 3322-3328

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm07040e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Warwick
  2. EPSRC
  3. Science City Research Alliance
  4. HEFCE
  5. NIH-NCRR COBRE [P20RR017716]
  6. NIST, U.S. Department of Commerce [70NANB7H6178]
  7. Birmingham Science City
  8. Advantage West Midlands
  9. European Regional Development Fund
  10. Wellcome Trust [055663/Z/98/Z]
  11. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G004897/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P20RR017716] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  13. EPSRC [EP/G004897/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Block copolymers are well-known to self-assemble into a range of 3-dimensional morphologies. However, due to their nanoscale dimensions, resolving their exact structure can be a challenge. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a powerful technique for achieving this, but for polymeric assemblies chemical fixing/staining techniques are usually required to increase image contrast and protect specimens from electron beam damage. Graphene oxide (GO) is a robust, water-dispersable, and nearly electron transparent membrane: an ideal support for TEM. We show that when using GO supports no stains are required to acquire high contrast TEM images and that the specimens remain stable under the electron beam for long periods, allowing sample analysis by a range of electron microscopy techniques. GO supports are also used for further characterization of assemblies by atomic force microscopy. The simplicity of sample preparation and analysis, as well as the potential for significantly increased contrast background, make GO supports an attractive alternative for the analysis of block copolymer assemblies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available