4.6 Article

Self-assembly of Fmoc-tetrapeptides based on the RGDS cell adhesion motif

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 7, Issue 24, Pages 11405-11415

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1sm06550e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/F048114/1, EP/G026203/1, EP/F500378/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/F011199/1]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya
  4. [MAT2009-09138]
  5. [2009SGR1208]
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F048114/1, EP/G026203/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-assembly in aqueous solution has been investigated for two Fmoc [Fmoc - N-(fluorenyl)-9-methoxycarbonyl] tetrapeptides comprising the RGDS cell adhesion motif from fibronectin or the scrambled sequence GRDS. The hydrophobic Fmoc unit confers amphiphilicity on the molecules, and introduces aromatic stacking interactions. Circular dichroism and FTIR spectroscopy show that the self-assembly of both peptides at low concentration is dominated by interactions among Fmoc units, although Fmoc-GRDS shows beta-sheet features, at lower concentration than Fmoc-RGDS. Fibre X-ray diffraction indicates beta-sheet formation by both peptides at sufficiently high concentration. Strong alignment effects are revealed by linear dichroism experiments for Fmoc-GRDS. Cryo-TEM and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) reveal that both samples form fibrils with a diameter of approximately 10 nm. Both Fmoc-tetrapeptides form self-supporting hydrogels at sufficiently high concentration. Dynamic shear rheometry enabled measurements of the moduli for the Fmoc-GRDS hydrogel, however syneresis was observed for the Fmoc-RGDS hydrogel which was significantly less stable to shear. Molecular dynamics computer simulations were carried out considering parallel and antiparallel beta-sheet configurations of systems containing 7 and 21 molecules of Fmoc-RGDS or Fmoc-GRDS, the results being analyzed in terms of both intermolecular structural parameters and energy contributions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available