4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A Hybrid of Metabolic Flux Analysis and Bayesian Factor Modeling for Multiomic Temporal Pathway Activation

Journal

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages 880-889

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sb5003407

Keywords

multiomics; flux-balance analysis; Escherichia coli; Bayesian factor modeling; pathway correlation; temporal pathway activation

Funding

  1. EU Mission T2D project
  2. Royal Thai Government Scholarship
  3. EU MIMOMICS project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing availability of multiomic data provides a highly comprehensive view of cellular processes at the levels of mRNA, proteins, metabolites, and reaction fluxes. However, due to probabilistic interactions between components depending on the environment and on the time course, casual, sometimes rare interactions may cause important effects in the cellular physiology. To date, interactions at the pathway level cannot be measured directly, and methodologies to predict pathway cross-correlations from reaction fluxes are still missing. Here, we develop a multiomic approach of flux-balance analysis combined with Bayesian factor modeling with the aim of detecting pathway cross-correlations and predicting metabolic pathway activation profiles. Starting from gene expression profiles measured in various environmental conditions, we associate a flux rate profile with each condition. We then infer pathway cross-correlations and identify the degrees of pathway activation with respect to the conditions and time course using Bayesian factor modeling. We test our framework on the most recent metabolic reconstruction of Escherichia coli in both static and dynamic environments, particular groups of reactions and how it varies over time. In a dynamic environment, characterize the temporal progression of pathway activation in response to given stimuli. thus predicting the functionality of our method can be readily used to

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available