4.6 Review

Density functional theory for predicting polymeric forces against surface fouling

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 6, Issue 19, Pages 4631-4646

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0sm00034e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF of China [20776005, 20736002, 20874005]
  2. Beijing Novel Program [2006B17]
  3. NCET [NCET-06-0095]
  4. ROCS Foundation [LX2007-02]
  5. MOE of China [IRT0807]
  6. BUCT
  7. US National Science Foundation [CBET-0852353]
  8. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-06ER46296]
  9. National Institute of Health [R21AI077532-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polymer-based non-stick'' surfaces have been proposed as the next generation of effective and environmentally-friendly coating materials for protecting implanted biomedical devices and for marine antifouling. However, identification of polymeric systems for universal fouling control is often impeded by the poor knowledge of interactions between biological substances and polymeric substrates in diverse aqueous environments. In this article, we review predictions of the polymer density functional theory (DFT) on the structural and surface properties of polymer brushes and polymer nanocomposites that are potentially useful for antifouling applications. In comparison to alternative theoretical methods, DFT exhibits versatile features that are ideal for investigating various polymer-mediated interactions, self-organization of nanoparticles, and surface-induced phase transitions. It is capable of explicit description of important microscopic details of polymeric systems including the molecular excluded-volume effects, associating interactions, van der Waals attraction, Coulomb forces, and inter- and intra-molecular correlations. The theoretical descriptions of surface forces may provide helpful guidelines in the design and development of polymeric materials for preventing non-specific adsorption of biological substances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available