4.6 Review

Diversity of structure, morphology and wetting of plant surfaces

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages 1943-1963

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b804854a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU)
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung, Forschung und Technologie (BMBF)
  3. German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)
  4. Akademie der Wissenschaften Mainz
  5. University of Bonn

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review paper presents the diversity of plant surface structures from a single cell to multi-cellular surface sculptures. There is still no comprehensive book which provides an overview of the diversity of plant surface structures. This article presents a guide for the description of cellular and sub-cellular plant surface structures, which include hairs, wax crystals and surface folding. Biological surfaces are multifunctional boundary layers to their environment. Functionally optimized surfaces are one of the key innovations in the more than 400 million years of evolution of land plants. In the plant surface, micro- and nanostructures play a special role, and a large diversity of surface structures exists at different size levels. Well known functional aspects of plant surface structures are the reduction of particle adhesion, the sliding structures of carnivorous plants for insect catching, and the self-cleaning properties of the superhydrophobic Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) leaves. Their structures and functions might be useful models for the development of functional materials. The surface properties of plants are based on physico-chemical principles and can be transferred to technical biomimetic'' materials, as successfully done for the self-cleaning properties of the Lotus leaves. This article is designed as an introduction for biologists and non biologists and should stimulate the reader to initiate or intensify the study of biological surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available