4.6 Article

Dominance rule and opposition-based particle swarm optimization for two-stage assembly scheduling with time cumulated learning effect

Journal

SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 23, Issue 19, Pages 9617-9628

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-018-3525-y

Keywords

Two-stage assembly; Flowshop scheduling; Time cumulated learning function; Dominance rule; Particle swarm optimization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71501024, 71871148]
  2. Taiwan's Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST105-2221-E-035-053-MY3]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T110631, 2017M612099]
  4. Sichuan University [2018hhs-47]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a two-stage assembly flowshop scheduling model with time cumulated learning effect, which exists in many realistic scheduling settings. By the time cumulated learning effect, we mean that the actual job processing time of a job depends on its scheduled position as well as the processing times of the jobs already processed. The first stage consists of two independently working machines where each machine produces its own component. The second stage consists of a single assembly machine. The objective is to identify a schedule that minimizes the total completion time of all jobs. With analysis on the discussed problem, some dominance rules are developed to optimize the solving procedure. Incorporating with the developed dominance rules, a dominance rule and opposition-based particle swarm optimization algorithm (DR-OPSO) and branch-and-bound are devised. Computational experiments have been conducted to compare the performances of the proposed DR-OPSO and branch-and-bound through comparing with the standard O-PSO and PSO. The results fully demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed DR-OPSO algorithm, providing references to the relevant decision-makers in practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available