4.5 Article

Risk Factors for Graft infection After Craniopiasty in Patients with Large Hemicranial Bony Defects

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages 431-437

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.045

Keywords

Cranioplasty; Decompressive craniectomy; Infection; Risk factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To identify infection incidence and related risk factors in patients who underwent cranioplasty (CP) after unilateral decoropressive craniectomy (DC). METHODS: CP after DC was performed in 45 patients from April 2011 through January 2012. The covariates studied were compared with occurrence versus nonoccurrence of infection. Univariate analysis was performed, followed by a multivariate analysis and development of independent logistic regression models with significance of 5%. RESULTS: Wound infections were observed in 24% of cases. Patients treated with polymethyl inethacrylate flaps had a 31% rate of infection compared with 12% hi patients treated with autologous flaps, but the difference vvas not statistically significant (P = 0.279). Increased risk of infection was associated with performing CP during the same period of hospitalization as DC (45% vs. 8%; P = 0.006), recent systemic infection (53% vs. 10%; P = 0.003), a Glasgow Outcome Scale score lower than 4 (48% vs. none; P < 0.001), motor deficit (42% vs. 5%; P = 0.011), and lower levels of hemoglobin (P < 0.001). Another risk factor for infection was an interval between DC and CP of 29-84 days compared with >168 days (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of wound infection was high. Risk factors included motor deficits, Glasgow Outcome Scale score <4, lower hemoglobin levels, recent systemic infections, interval between DC and CP of 29-84 days, and DC and CP performed during the same hospitalization. Performing CP during a different hospitalization may reduce the risk of graft infection because the hemoglobin level would be higher, and patients would be less dependent and free of recent infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available