4.5 Article

Social comparison modulates the neural responses to regret and subsequent risk-taking behavior

Journal

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages 1059-1070

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsy066

Keywords

regret; risk taking; social comparison; functional connectivity; ventral striatum; dACC

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271090, 71371180]
  2. Key Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China [14AZD106]
  3. Shanghai Leading talent Plan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current functional magnetic resonance imaging fMRI study investigated how outcomes achieved by others affect subjective regret and subsequent behavior. During the task, participants were asked to open a series of boxes consecutively until they decided to stop. Each box contained a reward (gold), except for one that contained an adverse stimulus (devil), which caused the participants to lose all the gold they collected in that trial. Importantly, participants were instructed that every trial they encountered would also be played in parallel by another player. During the feedback stage, outcomes of both the participant and the other player were presented. Behaviorally, participants felt less regret and took less risk when objective outcomes improved or when their outcomes were better than others. Participants tended to take more risk after experiencing regret. At the neural level, the ventral striatum (VS) and the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pgACC) showed increased activation as objective outcomes improved. Across participants, activation of the VS was positively correlated with corresponding behavioral changes. Increased activation of the VS and significantly higher functional connectivity with the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) were found when their outcomes were better than others. Additionally, the VS-dACC functional connectivity was correlated with risk-taking behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available