4.5 Article

Brain structure links trait creativity to openness to experience

Journal

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 191-198

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsu041

Keywords

openness to experience; trait creativity; creativity assessment packet; voxel-based morphometry

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070900, 31271087]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University by the Ministry of Education
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SWU1209101]
  4. Key Discipline Fund of National 211 Project [TR201208-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Creativity is crucial to the progression of human civilization and has led to important scientific discoveries. Especially, individuals are more likely to have scientific discoveries if they possess certain personality traits of creativity (trait creativity), including imagination, curiosity, challenge and risk-taking. This study used voxel-based morphometry to identify the brain regions underlying individual differences in trait creativity, as measured by the Williams creativity aptitude test, in a large sample (n = 246). We found that creative individuals had higher gray matter volume in the right posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG), which might be related to semantic processing during novelty seeking (e.g. novel association, conceptual integration and metaphor understanding). More importantly, although basic personality factors such as openness to experience, extroversion, conscientiousness and agreeableness (as measured by the NEO Personality Inventory) all contributed to trait creativity, only openness to experience mediated the association between the right pMTG volume and trait creativity. Taken together, our results suggest that the basic personality trait of openness might play an important role in shaping an individual's trait creativity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available