4.5 Article

Neural responses to unfairness and fairness depend on self-contribution to the income

Journal

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages 1498-1505

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst131

Keywords

unfairness; self-contribution; AI; ACC; DLPFC; TPJ

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271090, 31100728, 90924013]
  2. Projects Planning in Shanghai Philosophy and Social Sciences Research [2012JJY001]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [12ZS046]
  4. Fudan University [2011SHKXZD008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-contribution to the income (individual achievement) was an important factor which needs to be taken into individual's fairness considerations. This study aimed at elucidating the modulation of self-contribution to the income, on recipient's responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game. Eighteen participants were scanned while they were playing an adapted version of the Ultimatum Game as responders. Before splitting money, the proposer and the participant (responder) played the ball-guessing game. The responder's contribution to the income was manipulated by both the participant's and the proposer's accuracy in the ball-guessing game. It turned out that the participants more often rejected unfair offers and gave lower fairness ratings when they played a more important part in the earnings. At the neural level, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction showed greater activities to unfairness when self-contribution increased, whereas ventral striatum and medial orbitofrontal gyrus showed higher activations to fair (vs unfair) offers in the other-contributed condition relative to the other two. Besides, the activations of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during unfair offers showed positive correlation with rejection rates in the self-contributed condition. These findings shed light on the significance of self-contribution in fairness-related social decision-making processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available