Journal
SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 481-493Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss022
Keywords
situation attribution; person attribution; spontaneous inferences
Categories
Funding
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, OZR Grant [GOA68]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research explores how observers make causal beliefs about an event in terms of the person or situation. Thirty-four participants read various short descriptions of social events that implied either the person or the situation as the cause. Half of them were explicitly instructed to judge whether the event was caused by something about the person or the situation (intentional inferences), whereas the other half was instructed simply to read the material carefully (spontaneous inferences). The results showed common activation in areas related to mentalizing, across all types of causes or instructions (posterior superior temporal sulcus, temporo-parietal junction, precuneus). However, the medial prefrontal cortex was activated only under spontaneous instructions, but not under intentional instruction. This suggests a bias toward person attributions (e.g. fundamental attribution bias). Complementary to this, intentional situation attributions activated a stronger and more extended network compared to intentional person attributions, suggesting that situation attributions require more controlled, extended and broader processing of the information.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available