4.5 Article

Reduced emotion processing efficiency in healthy males relative to females

Journal

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 316-325

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss137

Keywords

face emotion processing; affect perception; sex differences; gender differences

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [RR024987, MH074459]
  2. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  3. University of Michigan Depression Center
  4. University of Michigan Department of Psychiatry
  5. University of Michigan General Clinical Research Center [MUL1RR024986]
  6. University of Michigan fMRI Center Pilot Scans
  7. Phil F. Jenkins Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined sex differences in categorization of facial emotions and activation of brain regions supportive of those classifications. In Experiment 1, performance on the Facial Emotion Perception Test (FEPT) was examined among 75 healthy females and 63 healthy males. Females were more accurate in the categorization of fearful expressions relative to males. In Experiment 2, 3T functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired for a separate sample of 21 healthy females and 17 healthy males while performing the FEPT. Activation to neutral facial expressions was subtracted from activation to sad, angry, fearful and happy facial expressions. Although females and males demonstrated activation in some overlapping regions for all emotions, many regions were exclusive to females or males. For anger, sad and happy, males displayed a larger extent of activation than did females, and greater height of activation was detected in diffuse cortical and subcortical regions. For fear, males displayed greater activation than females only in right postcentral gyri. With one exception in females, performance was not associated with activation. Results suggest that females and males process emotions using different neural pathways, and these differences cannot be explained by performance variations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available