4.5 Article

Functional abnormalities of the default network during self- and other-reflection in autism

Journal

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 177-190

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsn011

Keywords

autism spectrum disorders; retrosplenial cortex; posterior cingulate cortex; default mode; rest

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH36840, R01 MH036840] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies of autism have identified functional abnormalities of the default network during a passive resting state. Since the default network is also typically engaged during social, emotional and introspective processing, dysfunction of this network may underlie some of the difficulties individuals with autism exhibit in these broad domains. In the present experiment, we attempted to further delineate the nature of default network abnormality in autism using experimentally constrained social and introspective tasks. Thirteen autism and 12 control participants were scanned while making true/ false judgments for various statements about themselves ( SELF condition) or a close other person ( OTHER), and pertaining to either psychological personality traits ( INTERNAL) or observable characteristics and behaviors ( EXTERNAL). In the ventral medial prefrontal cortex/ ventral anterior cingulate cortex, activity was reduced in the autism group across all judgment conditions and also during a resting condition, suggestive of task-independent dysfunction of this region. In other default network regions, overall levels of activity were not different between groups. Furthermore, in several of these regions, we found group by condition interactions only for INTERNAL/ EXTERNAL judgments, and not SELF/ OTHER judgments, suggestive of task-specific dysfunction. Overall, these results provide a more detailed view of default network functionality and abnormality in autism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available