4.5 Article

Right ventromedial prefrontal cortex: a neuroanatomical correlate of impulse control in boys

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsn035

Keywords

impulsive; FreeSurfer; brain development; structural MRI; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; externalizing

Funding

  1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [1 RO1 DE01 14399 01 A1]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA R01 DA022549]
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. National Center for Research Resources
  5. General Clinical Research Centers Program [RR00059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerging data on the neural mechanisms of impulse control highlight brain regions involved in emotion and decision making, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and amygdala. Variation in the development of these regions may influence ones propensity for impulsivity and, by extension, ones vulnerability to disorders involving low impulse control (e.g. substance abuse). Here we test the hypothesis that lower impulse control is associated with structural differences in these regions, particularly on the right side, in 61 normal healthy boys aged 717. We assessed parent- and teacher-reported behavioral ratings of impulse control (motor impulsivity and non-planning behavior) in relation to vmPFC, ACC and amygdala volume, measured using structural magnetic resonance imaging and FreeSurfer. A regression analysis showed that the right vmPFC was a significant predictor of impulse control ratings. Follow-up tests showed (i) a significant correlation between low impulse control and decreased right vmPFC volume, especially the medial sector of the vmPFC and (ii) significantly lower right vmPFC volume in a subgroup of 20 impulsive boys relative to 20 non-impulsive boys. These results are consistent with the notion that right vmPFC provides a neuroanatomical correlate of the normal variance in impulse control observed in boys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available