4.6 Article

Characterization of embroidered inductors

Journal

SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/19/11/115020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [R11-2005-065]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0057549] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the demand for wearable intelligent textile systems continues to expand, it is now essential to achieve a high-level of electronic circuit integration into textiles. By applying a commercial yarn manufacturing technique and a computer numerical control (CNC) embroidery process, metal composite embroidery yarns (MCEYs) comprised of three strands of fine metal filaments and polyester filaments, and embroidered circuits have been successfully produced. Using MCEYs, circular and square spiral inductors were embroidered on a textile substrate. Their inductive characteristics, i.e. inductance, self-resonance frequency, and quality factor, were investigated under three different environments, i.e. in free space, on a human body, and with a metal fabric ground. Their inductive characteristics could be easily modified by adjusting the circuit design. The validity of the MCEY inductors was demonstrated with Wheeler's formula and design equations for the MCEY inductors were proposed. When in contact with the human body, the self-resonance frequency of the circuit decreased but the inductance was not affected. Although the inductance and maximum quality factor decreased with a metal ground, the inductor gave a stable performance irrespective of the environment. The results also suggest that MCEY embroidery is a simple and eco-friendly process for producing flexible, light-weight, wearable circuitries in various designs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available