4.3 Article

Prevalence and abundance of Eimeria spp. infection in captive vicunas (Vicugna vicugna) from the Argentinean Andean Altiplano

Journal

SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 150-154

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.04.013

Keywords

Vicugna vicugna; Eimeria; Prevalence; Abundance; Argentina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two hundred and thirty-five faecal samples from adult and young captive vicunas from the Abra Pampa Experimental Station of the National Agricultural Technology Institute (Jujuy Province, Argentina) were obtained in May and November 2011 in order to study the prevalence and abundance of Eimeria spp. Faeces were individually assessed by two methods: the modified Mc Master technique for the diagnosis of the smaller Eimeria species: E. punoensis, E. alpacae and E. lamae and the sedimentation-flotation technique for the detection of the bigger Eimeria species: E. macusaniensis and E. ivitaensis. The five species of Eimeria of South American camelids were found in the vicunas population with prevalence ranging from >65% (E. punoensis and E. alpacae in both ages and also E. macusaniensis in young vicunas) to <2% (E. ivitaensis in both ages). The juveniles showed both higher prevalence and mean abundance than adults for most coccidian species, except for E. ivitaensis. E. punoensis exhibited the highest prevalence in young and adult vicunas whereas the highest mean abundance in juveniles was due to E. lamae (May) and E. punoensis (November). In adult vicunas, smaller Eimeria had a higher prevalence and mean abundance than the bigger ones for both sampling dates. Most (>70%) of adult and young vicunas were concurrently infected by two to four Eimeria species. Despite the high oocysts' outputs in some juveniles no clinical signs of coccidiosis were seen in them. The epidemiological patterns of Eimeria spp. infections in vicunas are discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available