4.8 Article

Positron Emitting Magnetic Nanoconstructs for PET/MR Imaging

Journal

SMALL
Volume 10, Issue 13, Pages 2688-2696

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201303933

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [CPRIT RP 110262]
  2. Pilot Projects of the Translational Imaging Department at the Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston (TX-USA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hybrid PET/MRI scanners have the potential to provide fundamental molecular, cellular, and anatomic information essential for optimizing therapeutic and surgical interventions. However, their full utilization is currently limited by the lack of truly multi-modal contrast agents capable of exploiting the strengths of each modality. Here, we report on the development of long-circulating positron-emitting magnetic nanoconstructs (PEM) designed to image solid tumors for combined PET/MRI. PEMs are synthesized by a modified nano-precipitation method mixing poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), lipids, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains with 5 nm iron oxide nanoparticles (USPIOs). PEM lipids are coupled with 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and subsequently chelated to Cu-64. PEMs show a diameter of 140 +/- 7 nm and a transversal relaxivity r(2) of 265.0 +/- 10.0 (mM x s)(-1), with a r(2)/r(1) ratio of 123. Using a murine xenograft model bearing human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231), intravenously administered PEMs progressively accumulate in tumors reaching a maximum of 3.5 +/- 0.25% ID/g tumor at 20 h post-injection. Correlation of PET and MRI signals revealed non-uniform intratumoral distribution of PEMs with focal areas of accumulation at the tumor periphery. These long-circulating PEMs with high transversal relaxivity and tumor accumulation may allow for detailed interrogation over multiple scales in a clinically relevant setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available