4.8 Article

Fluorescent Magnetic Fe3O4/Rare Earth Colloidal Nanoparticles for Dual-Modality Imaging

Journal

SMALL
Volume 9, Issue 17, Pages 2991-3000

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201300126

Keywords

rare earth complexes; polymerization; magnetic resonance imaging; colloidal nanoparticles; fluorescence imaging

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51273058, 81171386]
  2. National 973 Program of China [2011CB933103]
  3. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) General Research Funds [CityU 112212]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluorescent magnetic colloidal nanoparticles (FMCNPs) are produced by a two-step, seed emulsifier-free emulsion polymerization in the presence of oleic acid and sodium undecylenate-modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs). The Fe3O4/poly(St-co-GMA) nanoparticles are first synthesized as the seed and Eu(AA)(3)Phen is copolymerized with the remaining St and GMA to form the fluorescent polymer shell in the second step. The uniform core-shell structured FMCNPs with a mean diameter of 120 nm exhibit superparamagnetism with saturation magnetization of 1.92 emu/g. Red luminescence from the FMCNPs is confirmed by the salient fluorescence emission peaks of europium ions at 594 and 619 nm as well as 2-photon confocal scanning laser microscopy. The in vitro cytotoxicity test conducted using the MTT assay shows good cytocompatibility and the T-2 relaxivity of the FMCNPs is 353.86 mM(-1)S(-1) suggesting its potential in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In vivo MRI studies based on a rat model show significantly enhanced T-2-weighted images of the liver after administration and prussian blue staining of the liver tissue slice reveals accumulation of FMCNPs in the organ. The cytocompatibility, superparamagnetism, and excellent fluorescent properties of FMCNPs make them suitable for biological imaging probes in MRI and optical imaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available