4.6 Review

The conundrum of primary snoring in children: What are we missing in regards to cognitive and behavioural morbidity?

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 463-475

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2014.06.009

Keywords

OSA; Snoring; Children; Cognition; Behaviour; Hypoxia; Arousal; Inflammation; Referral bias; Environment

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Council of Australia [1008919]
  2. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Scheme
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Early Career Fellowship [1054774]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is common in children and describes a continuum of nocturnal respiratory disturbance from primary snoring (PS) to obstructive sleep apnoea (USA). Historically, PS has been considered benign, however there is growing evidence that children with PS exhibit cognitive and behavioural deficits equivalent to children with OSA. There are two popular mechanistic theories linking SDB with daytime morbidity: hypoxic insult to the developing brain; and sleep disruption due to repeated arousals. These theories apply well to USA, but children with PS experience neither hypoxia nor increased arousals when compared to non snoring controls. So what are we missing? This review summarises the literature examining daytime morbidity in children with PS and discusses the current debates surrounding this relationship. Specifically, questions exist as to the sensitivity of our standard assessment techniques to measure subtle hypoxia and arousal. There is also a suggestion that the association between PS and daytime morbidity may not be mediated by nocturnal respiratory disturbance at all, but by a number of other comorbid, but perhaps unrelated factors. As approximately 70% of children with SDB are diagnosed with PS, but are rarely treated, a paradigm shift in the investigation of PS may be required. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available