4.6 Review

Lifetime prevalence rates of sleep paralysis: A systematic review

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 311-315

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.01.007

Keywords

Sleep paralysis; Isolated sleep paralysis; Anxiety; Fear; Parasomnia; Prevalence

Funding

  1. NIMH [R01 MH 070664]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine lifetime prevalence rates of sleep paralysis. Data sources: Keyword term searches using sleep paralysis, isolated sleep paralysis, or parasomnia not otherwise specified were conducted using MEDLINE (1950-present) and PsychINFO (1872-present). English and Spanish language abstracts were reviewed, as were reference lists of identified articles. Study selection: Thirty five studies that reported lifetime sleep paralysis rates and described both the assessment procedures and sample utilized were selected. Data extraction: Weighted percentages were calculated for each study and, when possible, for each reported subsample. Data synthesis: Aggregating across studies (total N = 36,533), 7.6% of the general population, 28.3% of students, and 31.9% of psychiatric patients experienced at least one episode of sleep paralysis. Of the psychiatric patients with panic disorder, 34.6% reported lifetime sleep paralysis. Results also suggested that minorities experience lifetime sleep paralysis at higher rates than Caucasians. Conclusions: Sleep paralysis is relatively common in the general population and more frequent in students and psychiatric patients. Given these prevalence rates, sleep paralysis should be assessed more regularly and uniformly in order to determine its impact on individual functioning and better articulate its relation to psychiatric and other medical conditions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available