4.6 Review

Self-help therapy for insomnia: A meta-analysis

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 61-71

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2008.04.006

Keywords

Insomnia; Psychological treatment; Bibliotherapy; Self-help; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Insomnia is a prevalent problem which often leads to a reduced quality of life and diminished work productivity. Only a minority of patients are treated with effective non-pharmacological therapies. A self-help intervention might offer an inexpensive and more accessible alternative to face-to-face treatment. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies examining the effects of self-help interventions for insomnia, identified through extensive searches of bibliographical databases. We examined the effects of self-help on different steep outcomes, in comparison with both waiting lists controls and face-to-face treatments. Results: Ten studies with a total of 1000 subjects were included. The intervention did improve steep efficiency (d = 0.42; p < 0.05), steep onset latency (d = 0.29; p < 0.05), wake after steep onset (d = 0.44; p < 0.05) and steep quality (d = 0.33; P < 0.05) but not total steep time (d = 0.02; p > 0.05). The steep improvements were maintained over the longer term. Symptoms of anxiety and depression also decreased after self-help (d = 0.28; p < 0.05 and d = 0.51; p < 0.05, respectively). Although based on a very limited number of studies, the face-to-face treatments did not show statistically significant superiority to the self-help treatments. The effect sizes associated with self-help treatments might be overestimated due to publication bias. Conclusions: The effects of self-help treatments are small to moderate. Nevertheless, they might constitute a useful addition to existing treatment options especially when integrated in a stepped care approach. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available