4.6 Article

Sleep phenotypes in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 123-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2018.08.026

Keywords

ADHD; Pediatrics - Sleep apnea; Pediatrics - Insomnia; Epilepsy; Narcolepsy

Funding

  1. Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (ABREOC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: A case-control study was performed to test the hypothesis that children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have chronic sleep deprivation and may be classified into specific sleep-related phenotypes. Methods: Thirty outpatients with ADHD (nine females, mean age 10.1 +/- 2.1 years) were recruited consecutively, and given a comprehensive sleep assessment, including blood exams, sleep questionnaires, laboratory video-polysomnographic recordings (v-PSG), multiple sleep latency tests, and one-week actigraphy. The PSG parameters were compared to those of 25 age-matched controls (12 females, mean age 10.34 +/- 1.54 years) who underwent only the v-PSG. Results: ADHD children were classified as follows: a narcolepsy-like phenotype was found in four; delayed sleep onset insomnia in five; obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in 15; periodic limb movements in eight, and sleep epileptiform discharges in 10 children. All subjects had a total sleep time shorter than 9 h at actigraphy, ferritin levels lower than 60 mcg/L, and a history of sleep problems (mainly OSA and insomnia). Compared to controls, the ADHD group had a higher apnea-hypopnea index at PSG. Conclusions: A full sleep assessment in children with ADHD confirmed the validity of the sleep phenotypes hypothesis, and revealed a much higher percentage of sleep problems than that found in the literature. Beyond the sleep phenotypes, all children reported a history of sleep problems and slept less than 9 h per night, indicating chronic sleep deprivation that should be evaluated as a possible unifying marker of ADHD. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available