4.6 Article

The associations between self-reported sleep duration and adolescent health outcomes: What is the role of time spent on Internet use?

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 195-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.09.004

Keywords

Adolescent behavior; Sleep deprivation; Internet; Health status; Obesity; Suicidal ideation; Depression

Funding

  1. A*STAR infrastructure Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study aimed to examine the associations of self-reported sleep duration with adolescent health outcomes, taking into account time spent on Internet use. Methods: We used data from the 2008-2009 Korea Youth Behavioral Risk Factor Survey, a cross-sectional online survey of middle and high school students aged 13-18 years in South Korea (N = 136,589) to examine the associations of self-reported sleep duration with four mental and physical health measures, e.g. self-report of depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, weight status, and self-rated health. The binary logit and generalized ordered logit models controlled for time spent on Internet use for non-study purposes and other factors. Results: Shorter self-reported sleep duration was associated with a higher likelihood of reporting depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and overweight or obese status, and a lower likelihood of reporting better self-rated health, even after accounting for time spent on Internet use. Excessive Internet use was found to be an independent risk factor for these outcomes. Conclusions: Among in-school adolescents in South Korea, shorter sleep duration and excessive Internet use are independently and additively associated with multiple indicators of adverse health status. Excessive Internet use may have not only direct adverse health consequences, but also have indirect negative effects through sleep deprivation. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available