4.6 Article

Increased cortical excitability after selective REM sleep deprivation in healthy humans: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 288-292

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.11.020

Keywords

REM sleep deprivation; Cortical excitability; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Intracortical inhibition (ICI); Cortical silent period

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: REM sleep has antiepileptogenic properties whereas, its loss is known to have a proconvulsive role. However, the mechanisms underlying the proepileptogenic effects of REM sleep deprivation are yet not fully understood. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of selective REM sleep deprivation (SRD) on cortical excitability in healthy subjects by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Methods: Ten normal subjects underwent three TMS sessions: (1) in baseline condition (BL), (2) after SRD by awakening them at each REM sleep onset and (3) after non-rapid eye movement sleep awakenings (NREM-A) as control for potential non-specific effects of interruptions. The TMS investigation included two protocols: (a) the evaluation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and silent period (SP) parameters, recorded in response to single pulse magnetic stimulation; (b) the evaluation of the time course of intracortical motor activity tested with paired-pulse TMS applied at inter-stimulus intervals of 1-10 ms. Results: After SRD the principal finding observed using single pulse TMS was a significant reduction in the duration of SP whereas, a reduction of intracortical inhibition was found, using the paired-pulse TMS. TMS parameters did not show significant changes after NREM-A with respect to BL. Conclusions: SRD may influence cortical excitability with a reduction of inhibitory intracortical mechanisms, thus supporting the proconvulsant role of REM loss. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available