4.6 Article

Experimentally induced arousals do not elicit periodic leg motor activity during sleep in normal subjects

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 85-90

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.09.021

Keywords

Periodic leg movement during sleep; PLMS; Arousal; Autonomic activation; Sleep fragmentation; Heart rate variability

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL075078]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate whether eliciting repetitive cortical and autonomic arousals during sleep is able to induce the occurrence of periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS). Methods: Fifteen normal subjects underwent one night of uninterrupted and two sequential nights of experimental sleep fragmentation achieved by auditory and mechanical stimuli eliciting frequent EEG arousals. Sleep was polygraphically recorded and subsequently used to determine the frequency of arousals and occurrence of leg movement (LM) activity during the first (baseline) and the second fragmentation night. Also, heart rate variability parameters were obtained to assess the autonomic changes induced by the stimulation. Results: Sleep fragmentation was associated with an increase in the arousal index, percentage of sleep stage 1, and frequency of stage shifts. In addition, there was a decrease in sleep latency and in percentage of slow-wave sleep. Moreover, a significant increase in heart rate variability and especially of its sympathetic component, was also found. In contrast, parameters of the leg movement activity showed no significant change following experimental sleep fragmentation. The lack of an increase in leg movement activity was also observed in one subject who demonstrated PLMS at baseline. Conclusions: Experimental sleep fragmentation is not associated with an increase in PLMS in normal young adults. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available