4.1 Article

Rapid changes in scores on the two largest principal components of the electroencephalographic spectrum demarcate the boundaries of drowsy sleep

Journal

SLEEP AND BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 154-164

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/sbr.12017

Keywords

drowsy sleep; principal component analysis; sleep scoring; sleep-wake regulation; stage 1 sleep

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [07-06-00263-a, 10-06-00114-a, 13-06-00042-a]
  2. Russian Foundation for Humanities [06-06-00375-a, 12-06-18001-e]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurobiological mechanisms determining a possibility of parsimonious descriptions of the continuous sleep process as a sequence of a few all-or-nothing variables called sleep stages remain unknown. We tested a suggestion that stage 1 sleep (drowsy sleep) corresponds to a rapid decay of a wake-promoting process and that the boundary with stages 2 separates this decay from a rapid buildup of a sleep-promoting process. The analyzed dataset included power spectra calculated from the electroencephalographic (EEG) records obtained during attempts of 15 adults to stay permanently awake for 43-61h and during multiple napping attempts of nine sleep-deprived, nine sleep-restricted, and 11 sleep-unrestricted adults. The time courses of scores on the 1st and 2nd principal components of the EEG spectra reflected the suggested phase relationships between rapid changes in the sleep- and wake-promoting processes, respectively. The 1st principal component score was permanently attenuated during wakefulness and stage 1 sleep but started to build up on the boundary with stage 2. In contrast, the 2nd principal component score started to fall down near the wake-sleep boundary but remained unchanged across stage 2. We concluded that stage 1 sleep corresponds to the decay phase of the wake-promoting process that precedes the buildup phase of the sleep-promoting process during stage 2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available