4.6 Article

A Scale for Assessing the Severity of Arousal Disorders

Journal

SLEEP
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 127-U345

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.5665/sleep.3322

Keywords

Arousal disorders; confusional arousal; parasomnia; sexsomnia; sleep related eating disorder; sleep terror; sleepwalking

Funding

  1. French Research Ministry
  2. Kleine-Levin Syndrome Foundation
  3. Fondation NRJ-Institut de France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Arousal disorders may have serious health consequences. Objective: To develop a scale assessing the severity of arousal disorders (Paris Arousal Disorders Severity Scale, PADSS). Setting: University hospital. Design: Controlled study. Participants: Consecutive patients (older than 15 y), with sleepwalking (SW) and/or sleep terrors (ST), subjects with previous SW/ST, normal controls and patients with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Intervention: The self-rated scale listed 17 parasomniac behaviors (PADSS-A), assessed their frequency from never to twice or more per night (PADSS-B) and evaluated the consequences (PADSS-C: disturbed sleep, injuries, fatigue, and psychological consequences). The clinimetric properties and face validity of the scale were tested. Results: Half of the 73 patients with SW/ST (more men than women) had injured themselves or others, whereas 15% had concomitant sexsomnia and 23% had amnestic eating behaviors. The total PADSS score (range: 0-50) was 19.4 +/- 6.3 (range: 8-36) in this group, 11.7 +/- 5.9 in 26 subjects with previous SW/ST, 8.8 +/- 3.2 in 26 patients with RBD, and 2.0 +/- 3.5 in 53 normal controls (P < 0.05). The PADSS demonstrated high sensitivity (83.6%), specificity (87.8%), internal consistency, and test-retest reliability (0.79). The best cutoff for the total score was at 13/14. Exploratory factor analysis revealed two components: wandering and violence/handling. The complexity of behaviors emerging from N3 sleep (scored on videopolysomnography) positively correlated with scores for the PADSS-total, PADSS-A, PADSS-C, and the violence/handling factor. Conclusion: This scale had reasonable psychometric properties and could be used for screening and stratifying patients and for evaluating the effects of treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available