4.2 Article

Vitamin D requirement in pregnancy to prevent deficiency in neonates: a randomised trial

Journal

SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 285-288

Publisher

SINGAPORE MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2013110

Keywords

25-hydroxyvitamin D; neonate; pregnancy; vitamin D

Ask authors/readers for more resources

INTRODUCTION The exact amount of vitamin D required for pregnant women to adequately supply the foetus during pregnancy is still unclear. This randomised trial attempted to determine the optimal dose of vitamin D necessary during pregnancy in order to attain a vitamin D level > 20 ng/mL in neonates. METHODS A total of 51 healthy, pregnant women in Yazd, Iran, were recruited in 2009. Of these, 34 were randomised to receive either 50,000 IU (Group A) or 100,000 IU (Group B) of vitamin D3 per month from the second trimester of pregnancy. The remaining 17 pregnant women, who formed the third group (Group C) and were found to have vitamin D deficiency, were initially treated with 200,000 IU of vitamin D3, following which the dose was adjusted to 50,000 IU per month. 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH] D) in cord blood was measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay, and a serum 25(OH) D level < 20 ng/mL was defined as deficiency. RESULTS All the pregnant women had a vitamin D level < 30 ng/mL at the beginning of the second trimester. The neonates of 76% of women from Group A had sufficient levels of 25(OH) D. All the neonates born to women in Groups B and C had 25(OH) D > 20 ng/mL. No side effects were observed in our participants during the period of vitamin D supplementation. CONCLUSION A vitamin D3 dose > 50,000 IU/month is required during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy for vitamin D-deficient pregnant women in order for their neonates to achieve serum 25(OH) D levels > 20 ng/mL. Supplementation with < 50,000 IU/month is insufficient to ensure a vitamin D level > 20 ng/mL in all neonates born to vitamin D-deficient pregnant women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available