4.6 Review

l1 Trend Filtering

Journal

SIAM REVIEW
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 339-360

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/070690274

Keywords

detrending; l(1) regularization; Hodrick-Prescott filtering; piecewise linear fitting; sparse signal recovery; feature selection; time series analysis; trend estimation

Funding

  1. Precourt Institute on Energy Efficiency
  2. Army award [W911NF-07-1-0029]
  3. NSF [0529426]
  4. NASA [NNX07AEIIA]
  5. AFOSR [FA9550-06-1-0514, FA9550-06-1-0312]
  6. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [0529426] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problem of estimating underlying trends in time series data arises in a variety of disciplines. In this paper we propose a variation on Hodrick-Prescott (H-P) filtering, a widely used method for trend estimation. The proposed l(1) trend filtering method substitutes a sum of absolute values (i.e., l(1) norm) for the sum of squares used in H-P filtering to penalize variations in the estimated trend. The l(1) trend filtering method produces trend estimates that are piecewise linear, and therefore it is well suited to analyzing time series with an underlying piecewise linear trend. The kinks, knots, or changes in slope of the estimated trend can be interpreted as abrupt changes or events in the underlying dynamics of the time series. Using specialized interior-point methods, l(1) trend filtering can be carried out with not much more effort than H-P filtering; in particular, the number of arithmetic operations required grows linearly with the number of data points. We describe the method and some of its basic properties and give some illustrative examples. We show how the method is related to l(1) regularization-based methods in sparse signal recovery and feature selection, and we list some extensions of the basic method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available