4.6 Article

PARALLEL ALGORITHMS FOR FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION PROBLEMS IN HAEMODYNAMICS

Journal

SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 1598-1622

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/090772836

Keywords

blood-flow models; fluid-structure interaction; finite elements; preconditioners; parallel algorithms

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020-117587]
  2. European Research Council [ERC-2008-AdG 227058]
  3. European Community [FP7/2007-2013, 224635]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020-117587] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing computational load required by most applications and the limits in hardware performances affecting scientific computing contributed in the last decades to the development of parallel software and architectures. In fluid-structure interaction (FSI) for haemodynamic applications, parallelization and scalability are key issues (see [L. Formaggia, A. Quarteroni, and A. Veneziani, eds., Cardiovascular Mathematics: Modeling and Simulation of the Circulatory System, Modeling, Simulation and Applications 1, Springer, Milan, 2009]). In this work we introduce a class of parallel preconditioners for the FSI problem obtained by exploiting the block-structure of the linear system. We stress the possibility of extending the approach to a general linear system with a block-structure, then we provide a bound in the condition number of the preconditioned system in terms of the conditioning of the preconditioned diagonal blocks, and finally we show that the construction and evaluation of the devised preconditioner is modular. The preconditioners are tested on a benchmark three-dimensional (3D) geometry discretized in both a coarse and a fine mesh, as well as on two physiological aorta geometries. The simulations that we have performed show an advantage in using the block preconditioners introduced and confirm our theoretical results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available