4.6 Article

MULTITARGET ERROR ESTIMATION AND ADAPTIVITY IN AERODYNAMIC FLOW SIMULATIONS

Journal

SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 708-731

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/070710962

Keywords

discontinuous Galerkin discretization; error estimation; adaptivity; multiple target functionals; compressible Navier-Stokes equations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Important quantities in aerodynamic flow simulations are the aerodynamic force coefficients including the pressure induced and the viscous stress induced drag, lift, and moment coefficients. In addition to the exact approximation of these quantities it is of increasing importance, in particular in the field of uncertainty quantification, to estimate the error in the computed quantities. In recent years a posteriori error estimation and goal-oriented refinement approaches have been developed for the accurate and efficient computation of single target quantities. The current approaches are based on computing an adjoint solution related to each of the specific target quantities under consideration. In this paper we extend this approach to the accurate and efficient computation of multiple target quantities. Instead of computing multiple adjoint solutions, one for each target functional, the new approach is based on the solution to one discrete adjoint problem and one discrete error problem. This way only two auxiliary problems are required irrespective of the number of target functionals. The practical performance of this approach is demonstrated for a laminar compressible flow. In particular, the proposed approach is compared to the standard approach of error estimation and goal-oriented refinement as well as to residual-based refinement. The performance of the algorithms is measured in terms of computing resources required for meeting industrial as well as academic accuracy requirements on the computed force coefficients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available