4.7 Article

FGF23 neutralization improves bone quality and osseointegration of titanium implants in chronic kidney disease mice

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep08304

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81371173, 81321002]
  2. Sichuan Province Youth Fund [2013JQ0017]
  3. 111 project of Ministry of Education of China
  4. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [R01-097105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide health problem. Serum levels of FGF23, a phosphaturic hormone, increase at the earliest stages of CKD, and have been found to be independently associated with the mortality and morbidity of CKD patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether FGF23 neutralization was able to improve bone quality and osseointegration of titanium implants. Uremia was induced by 5/6 nephrectomy in adult female mice. Postsurgery, the mice were injected with vehicle or FGF23 neutralizing antibody (5 mg/kg body weight) 3 times a week. Experimental titanium implants were inserted in the distal end of the femurs. FGF23 neutralization significantly increased serum phosphate, 1,25(OH)(2)D and BUN, and decreased serum PTH and FGF23, relative to vehicle-treated CKD mice. Histomorphometric analysis of the tibiae indicated that FGF23 neutralization normalized the osteoidosis observed in vehicle-treated CKD mice. Although bone-implant contact ratio remained unchanged by anti-FGF23 antibody treatment, the strength of osseointegration, as evidenced by a biomechanical push-in test, was significantly improved by FGF23 neutralization. Our findings revealed that FGF23 neutralization effectively improves bone quality and osseointegration of titanium implants in CKD mice, suggesting FGF23 as a key factor of CKD related bone diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available