4.7 Article

The Evidence of Glioblastoma Heterogeneity

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep07979

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [24659647]
  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Gifu University School of Medicine
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26670639, 24659647] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancers are composed of heterogeneous combinations of cells that exhibit distinct phenotypic characteristics and proliferative potentials. Because most cancers have a clonal origin, cancer stem cells (CSCs) must generate phenotypically diverse progenies including mature CSCs that can self-renew indefinitely and differentiated cancer cells that possess limited proliferative potential. However, no convincing evidence exists to suggest that only single CSCs are representative of patients' tumors. To investigate the CSCs' diversity, we established 4 subclones from a glioblastoma patient. These subclones were subsequently propagated and analyzed. The morphology, the self-renewal and proliferative capacities of the subclones differed. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and cDNA-microarray analyses revealed that each subclone was composed of distinct populations of cells. Moreover, the sensitivities of the subclones to an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor were dissimilar. In a mouse model featuring xenografts of the subclones, the progression and invasion of tumors and animal survival were also different. Here, we present clear evidence that a brain tumor contains heterogeneous subclones that exhibit dissimilar morphologies and self-renewal and proliferative capacities. Our results suggest that single cell-derived subclones from a patient can produce phenotypically heterogeneous self-renewing progenies in both in vitro and in vivo settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available