4.1 Article

Evaluation of the cobas 4800 CT/NG test for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Journal

SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages 470-473

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/sti.2010.042812

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Roche Diagnostics, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To investigate the performance of the fully automated cobas 4800 CT/NG test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Methods The study was conducted using 900 clinical specimens (496 urine and 404 swab specimens) for C trachomatis testing, of which 498 specimens (318 urine and 180 swab specimens) were also tested for N gonorrhoeae. The results of the cobas 4800 CT/NG test were compared with those obtained from the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG and COBAS TaqMan CT assays. N gonorrhoeae-positive specimens were further tested using in-house, real-time PCR assays. A panel of 223 Neisseria isolates was used to further investigate the performance of the cobas 4800 N gonorrhoeae assay. Results For urine specimens, the sensitivity, specificity and negative and positive predictive values of the cobas 4800 CT/NG test were 94.5%, 99.5%, 98.8% and 97.7%, respectively, for C trachomatis, and 92.9%, 100%, 99.7% and 100%, respectively, for N gonorrhoeae. For swab specimens, the sensitivity, specificity and negative and positive predictive values were 92.0%, 100%, 99.5% and 100%, respectively, for C trachomatis, and 100%, 99.4%, 100% and 90.0%, respectively, for N gonorrhoeae. All N gonorrhoeae isolates were positive and all non-gonococcal Neisseria strains were negative by the cobas 4800 N gonorrhoeae assay. Conclusions The cobas 4800 CT/NG test is suitable for high through-put identification of C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available