4.1 Article

Prevalence and Risk Factors of HSV-2 Infection and HSV-2/HIV Coinfection in Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study

Journal

SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 354-358

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318244aef0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Research of China [2008ZX10001-005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection and its coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in men who have sex with men (MSM) in China. Methods: A convenience sample of 1462 MSM were recruited from different settings (an STD clinic, a health center, and MSM venues) in 3 cities in China. Blood specimens were collected for testing for antibodies to HSV-2 and HIV to determinate the seroprevalence of HSV-2 infection and HSV-2/HIV coinfection. Information on sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics was collected to determine the risk factors associated with the infections. Results: The prevalence of HSV-2 infection in 1462 MSM was 16.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.2%-18.0%), the prevalence of HIV infection in this population was 9.5% (95% CI, 8.1%-11.1%), and the rate of coinfection of HSV-2 and HIV was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.4%-4.3%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that risk factors for HSV-2 infection included age older than 30 years, education level lower than senior high school, involvement in commercial sex work, and HIV-positive status. Education level lower than junior high school and history of sexual abuse were associated with HSV-2/HIV coinfection. Conclusions: The high prevalence of HSV-2 infection and HSV-2/HIV coinfection among MSM in China suggests that an increased focus on HSV control is warranted within China's prevention and intervention programs targeted toward MSM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available