4.0 Article

The epidemiology of anal cancer

Journal

SEXUAL HEALTH
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 504-508

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/SH12070

Keywords

adenocarcinoma; homosexual; human papillomavirus; squamous cell carcinoma

Funding

  1. CSL Biotherapies
  2. Merck
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1016307, 571402, 1013353]
  4. NHMRC [568819, 568971]
  5. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [568819] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anal cancer comprises malignancies of the anal canal principally of two morphologic variants: squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma. In most settings, SCC compromises more than 70% of cases. In the general population, anal cancer is uncommon, with age-standardised incidence rates mostly between 1 and 2 per 100 000 per year. However, incidence of anal SCC is increasing by 1-3% per year in developed country settings. High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types can be detected in 80-90% of all anal SCC cases, making it second only to cervical cancer in the closeness of its association with this virus. HPV-16 can be detected in similar to 90% of HPV-positive cases of anal SCC. Case-control studies have demonstrated that sexual risk factors (homosexuality in men and multiple sexual partners in women) are strongly associated with anal cancer risk. Other risk factors include immune deficiency and tobacco exposure. Anal cancer rates are highest in homosexual men, particularly in those who are HIV-positive, in whom anal cancer is among the most common of all cancers. Vaccination against HPV holds great promise for anal cancer prevention for those not already HPV-infected. For the current generation of adult high-risk populations, screening programs to allow early detection and treatment are under investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available