4.4 Article

Membrane Gas-Solvent Contactor Pilot Plant Trials of CO2 Absorption from Flue Gas

Journal

SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 16, Pages 2449-2458

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2014.937499

Keywords

non-porous; membrane contactor; flue gas; pilot plant; porous

Funding

  1. Australian Government through its Cooperative Research Centre program
  2. Particulate Fluids Processing Centre of the University of Melbourne

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Membrane gas-solvent contactors have received much attention for CO2 absorption, as the approach incorporates advantages from both solvent absorption and membrane gas separation. This study reports on pilot plant trials of three membrane contactors for the separation of CO2 from flue gas. The contactors were porous polypropylene (PP), porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and non-porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), with the solvent PuraTreatTM F-TM. To enable performance comparison, laboratory measurements based on a gas mixture of 10% CO2 in N-2 were also undertaken on the same contactor-solvent systems. It was found that the PP contactor experienced significant pore wetting in both laboratory and pilot plant studies. In contrast, the PTFE contactor experienced only minor pore wetting in the laboratory. However, in the pilot plant trial of the PTFE contactor extensive pore wetting was observed, and the overall mass transfer coefficient measured was comparable with the PP contactor. The non-porous PDMS contactor had an overall mass transfer coefficient two orders of magnitude less than the PP contactor, due to the greater mass transfer resistance of the polymeric film. However, the non-porous membrane does not experience pore wetting, which resulted in the overall mass transfer coefficient being similar for both laboratory and pilot plant measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available