4.7 Article

NGS-based Molecular diagnosis of 105 eyeGENE® probands with Retinitis Pigmentosa

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep18287

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Health and Human Services/National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute intramural program [06-EI-0236, 10-EI-N164, HHSN-260-2007-00001-C]
  2. Retinal Research Foundation
  3. Foundation Fighting Blindness [BR-GE-0613-0618-BCM]
  4. National Eye Institute [R01EY022356]
  5. National Institutes of Health Shared Instrument Grant [1S10RR026550]
  6. Burroughs Wellcome Trust Fund: The Houston Laboratory and Population Sciences Training Program in Gene Environment Interaction
  7. NIH T32 training grant [2T32EY007102-21A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The National Ophthalmic Disease Genotyping and Phenotyping Network (eyeGENE (R)) was established in an effort to facilitate basic and clinical research of human inherited eye disease. In order to provide high quality genetic testing to eyeGENE (R)'s enrolled patients which potentially aids clinical diagnosis and disease treatment, we carried out a pilot study and performed Next-generation sequencing (NGS) based molecular diagnosis for 105 Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) patients randomly selected from the network. A custom capture panel was designed, which incorporated 195 known retinal disease genes, including 61 known RP genes. As a result, disease-causing mutations were identified in 52 out of 105 probands (solving rate of 49.5%). A total of 82 mutations were identified, and 48 of them were novel. Interestingly, for three probands the molecular diagnosis was inconsistent with the initial clinical diagnosis, while for five probands the molecular information suggested a different inheritance model other than that assigned by the physician. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that NGS target sequencing is efficient and sufficiently precise for molecular diagnosis of a highly heterogeneous patient cohort from eyeGENE (R).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available