4.7 Article

High temperature CO2 sorption with gallium-substituted and promoted hydrotalcites

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages 202-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.03.007

Keywords

CO2 capture; Hydrotalcite; Sorption; High temperature; Post-combustion

Funding

  1. European Fund for Regional Development (ERDF) through COMPETE - Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade [PTDC/EQU/ERQ/098730/2008]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT)
  3. ERDF through Programa Operacional do Norte (ON2) [NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000026]
  4. FCT/MEC (PIDDAC)
  5. Portugal-Spain Cooperation Project [PT2009-0057, E-59/10]
  6. Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation [MAT 2009-08526]
  7. ERDF
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EQU-ERQ/098730/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrotalcites (HTC) and gallium-substituted hydrotalcites (HTC-10Ga) were prepared by co-precipitation and modified by impregnation with alkali (K and Cs) and alkaline-earth (Sr) metals. The materials were tested and screened for CO2 sorption at 573 K. The results indicate that the modification with potassium greatly enhanced the sorption capacity when compared with the original materials (both HTC and HTC-10Ga). An outstanding sorption capacity (2.01 mmol cm(-3) at 1.08 bar) was obtained for the sample partially substituted with gallium and modified with potassium (HTC-10Ga-20K). Moreover, this material was also submitted to sorption-desorption cycles towards CO2 under low-pressure conditions (< 0.0001-0.15 bar) to assess its use in cyclic operation. An average working capacity of 0.97 mmol cm(-3) and 0.25 mmol cm(-3) was obtained after repeated cycles at 573 K and 473 K, respectively. The sorption kinetics was assessed through uptake measurements, showing two parallel resistances, which were well described by the proposed model. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available