4.7 Article

Design optimization study of the extraction of olive leaves performed with pressurized liquid extraction using response surface methodology

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages 323-330

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.10.040

Keywords

Pressurized liquid extraction; Olea europaea; Oleuropein; Design of experiments; Response surface methodology

Funding

  1. European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) with environmentally friendly solvents namely water and ethanol was applied to olive leaves in order to optimize extraction yield, oleuropein content and antioxidant activity. The effect of various parameters was studied through a carefully designed optimization process. The study comprised of two distinct stages, a screening procedure using Plackett-Burman design followed by an optimization step using a central composite design (CCD). This led to the construction of a response surface indicating the optimal values for each parameter and response studied. Determination of the optimum extraction procedure was performed by comparison of the extracts' yield, oleuropein content determined by HPLC and radical scavenging activity evaluated in a DPPH assay. Extraction parameters with statistical significance were shown to be the ethanol content of the solvent mixture, the temperature of the extraction and the consecutive cycles of extractions. Concerning the extraction yield, an ethanolic extraction at 190 degrees C for 3 consecutive cycles was found to be optimal. Regarding the oleuropein content of the extract, a mixture of H2O/EtOH 43:57 in 190 degrees C for 1 extraction cycle provided the optimal results. Finally, regarding the DPPH assay, all the samples exhibited good antioxidant activity. The experimental values obtained from two different extraction procedures could be predicted within a 95% confidence interval, thus indicating the suitability of RSM in optimizing the extraction of olive leaves. (c) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available