4.7 Article

Superiority of Graphene over Polymer Coatings for Prevention of Microbially Induced Corrosion

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep13858

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USA National Science Foundation [CMMI 1234641, CMMI 1435783, 1454102]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [50921004, 50872136, 50972147]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-YW-231]
  4. NASA [NNX13AB25A]
  5. Electric Power Research Institute
  6. NASA [476686, NNX13AB25A] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prevention of microbially induced corrosion (MIC) is of great significance in many environmental applications. Here, we report the use of an ultra-thin, graphene skin (Gr) as a superior anti-MIC coating over two commercial polymeric coatings, Parylene-C (PA) and Polyurethane (PU). We find that Nickel (Ni) dissolution in a corrosion cell with Gr-coated Ni is an order of magnitude lower than that of PA and PU coated electrodes. Electrochemical analysis reveals that the Gr coating offers similar to 10 and similar to 100 fold improvement in MIC resistance over PU and PA coatings respectively. This finding is remarkable considering that the Gr coating (1-2 nm) is similar to 25 and similar to 4000 times thinner than the PA (40-50 nm), and PU coatings (20-80 mu m), respectively. Conventional polymer coatings are either non-conformal when deposited or degrade under the action of microbial processes, while the electro-chemically inert graphene coating is both resistant to microbial attack and is extremely conformal and defect-free. Finally, we provide a brief discussion regarding the effectiveness of as-grown vs. transferred graphene films for anti-MIC applications. While the as-grown graphene films are devoid of major defects, wet transfer of graphene is shown to introduce large scale defects that make it less suitable for the current application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available