4.7 Article

Development of a molecularly imprinted membrane for selective separation of flavonoids

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 3, Pages 337-344

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.10.024

Keywords

Molecular imprinting materials; Molecularly imprinted membrane; Silica materials; Selective channels; Flavonoids

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21076143]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry [2009-1341]
  3. Key Laboratory of Inorganic coating materials, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KLICM-2010-06]
  4. Basic Research of Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission [07JCY-BJC00700]
  5. Petro China Innovation Fund [060511-6-3]
  6. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B06006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The separation behavior of molecularly imprinted membrane (MIM) for flavonoids was investigated. The molecularly imprinted materials were prepared using luteolin as the template molecule and aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) as the functional monomer, followed by dispersing into polysulfone (PSF) to form the MIM. The flux and the separation properties of the MIM were tested, and the Scatchard equation was used to analyze the chemical binding properties of the MIM. Experiments at different temperature were carried out and the corresponding thermodynamic parameters of separation processes in the MIM were acquired using Van't Hoff equation. The results obtained using the Scatchard equation showed many chemical binding sites with functional groups inside the MIM's cavities. Further details of the separation processes of the MIM for flavonoids can be determined by investigating the type of pore channels in the MIM and the structure of template molecules. Crown Copyright (c) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available