4.7 Article

Floc characteristics of titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4) compared with aluminum and iron salts in humic acid-kaolin synthetic water treatment

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages 332-338

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.07.041

Keywords

Coagulation; Titanium tetrachloride; Floc size; Strength factor; Recovery factor

Funding

  1. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2006BAJ08B05]
  2. National Major Special Technological Programmes Concerning Water Pollution Control and Management [2008ZX07422-003-02]
  3. Chinese National Foundation of Natural Sciences [50678095, 50808114]
  4. Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC-CARE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The floc strength and regrowth properties of TiCl4, FeCl3, and Al-2(SO4)(3) were comparatively evaluated using humic acid-kaolin synthetic water sample. At the given optimum dosage (20 mg/L as Ti, 8 mg/L as Fe, and 2 mg/L as Al, respectively), the floc growth, breakage and regrowth of TiCl4, FeCl3, and Al-2(SO4)(3) were investigated by use of a laser diffraction particle sizing device. Jar tests were conducted to investigate the impact of shear force and breakage period on floc breakage and re-aggregation potential. Results indicated that the responses of flocs to increasing shear force and breakage period depend on the coagulant used. The ability of floc to resist breakage decreased with the increase of shear force. Floc strength properties were also measured in response to increasing shear force, with the results suggesting that the order of floc strength was TiCl4 > FeCl3 > Al-2(SO4)(3). Floc regrowth of these three coagulants after exposure to high shear was limited, and flocs formed by TiCl4 displayed the weakest recoverability. Similar results were obtained when breakage period was different. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available