4.7 Review

A review of ratiometric electrochemical sensors: From design schemes to future prospects

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 274, Issue -, Pages 501-516

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.138

Keywords

Ratiometric detection; Dual-signal; Electrochemistry; Built-in correction; Biosensor; Labels

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675092, 41476083, 21422504, 51525903, 21675093]
  2. Outstanding Youth Foundation of Shandong Province [JQ201406]
  3. Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province, China
  4. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [13/CDA/2155]
  5. Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology [2017ASTCP-OS09]
  6. Special Project on the Integration of Industry, Education and Research of Guangzhou [201604016008]
  7. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [13/CDA/2155] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ratiometric electrochemical sensors are being considered a significant advance in the fields of electroanalysis and are now attracting the attention of many research laboratories. Different from classic electrochemical sensors which typically adopt the absolute value of the signal as the output, ratiometric electrochemical sensors possess dual electrochemical signals and the quantitative measurement of target is based on the ratio of these two signals. The ratiometric signal readout mode provides a built-in correction factor to eliminate the contribution from non-specific interferences. Thus, greater reproducibility, accuracy and sensitivity are obtained, which are critical demands of the classic electrochemical sensor. In this review, we discuss recent advances in ratiometric electrochemical sensors. In addition, we give critical perspectives on the different design schemes, development status and application prospects for ratiometric electrochemical sensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available