4.7 Article

Improved PLS regression based on SVM classification for rapid analysis of coal properties by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 193, Issue -, Pages 723-729

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.12.028

Keywords

Near infrared reflectance spectra; Coal analysis; Partial Least Square regression; Support Vector Machine

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61128003, 61004132]
  2. Open Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Zhejiang University, China [ICT1210]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using near infrared reflectance spectra (NIRS) for rapid coal property analysis is convenient, fast, safe and could be used as online analysis method. This study first built Partial Least Square regression (PLS regression) models for six coal properties (total moisture (Mt), inherent moisture (Minh), ash (Ash), volatile matter (VM), fixed carbon (FC), and sulfur (S)) with the NIRS of 199 samples. The 199 samples came from different mines including 4 types of coal (fat coal, coking coal, lean coal and meager lean coal). In comparison, models for the six properties according to different types were built. Results show that models for different types are more effective than that of the entire sample set. A new method for coal classification was then obtained by applying Principle Components Analysis (PCA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) to the spectra of the coal samples, which was of high classification accuracy and time saving. At last, different PLS regression models were built for different types classified by the new method and got better prediction results than that of full samples. Thus, the predictive ability was improved by fitting the coal samples into corresponding models using the SVM classification. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available